Valentine’s Day


The Festival of Love was one of the festivals of the pagan Romans, when paganism was the prevalent religion of the Romans more than seventeen centuries ago. In the pagan Roman concept, it was an expression of “spiritual love”.

There were myths associated with this pagan festival of the Romans called Lupercalia.Among the most famous of these myths was the Roman belief that Romulus, the founder of Rome, was suckled one day by a she-wolf, which gave him strength and wisdom. The Romans used to celebrate this event in mid-February each year with a big festival.

One of the rituals of this festival was the sacrifice a goat.
A goat was the offering the best adapted to their character and attributes, the flesh of the victim was roasted on willow spits, and the riotous youths, who crowded to the feast, ran naked about the fields with leather thongs in their hands, communicating as it was supposed, the blessing of fecundity to the women whom they touched………’’
(The history of the decline and fall of the Roman empire, Volume 4, By Edward Gibbon p:282)

Opinions abound as to who was the original Valentine, with the most popular theory that he was a clergyman who was executed for secretly marrying couples in ancient Rome in spite of Emperor Claudius II, who felt that marriage weakened his soldiers. In A.D. 496, Pope Gelasius I declared Feb. 14 as Valentine Day. Through the centuries, the Christian holiday became a time to exchange love messages, and St. Valentine became the patron saint of lovers. Esther Howland, a native of Massachusetts, is given credit for selling the first mass-produced valentine cards in the 1840s. The spirit of love continues today as valentines are sent with sentimental verses, from and to young and old romantics.

It is another common opinion that the Christian church may have decided to celebrate Valentine’s feast day in the middle of February in an effort to Christianize celebrations of the pagan Lupercalia, and that a commemorative feast was established in 496 by Pope Gelasius I, of those “… whose names are justly reverenced among men, but whose acts are known only to God,” among whom was Valentine, was set for the useful day.

Today there are many things bound with the festival which conclude to immorality and general disorder in the society. On the contrary Islam does not allow the secret relations between a man and woman and gives the beautiful teachings of marriage which leads to a perfect and peaceful society and an integral part of the teaching is to have no secret relation between man and woman. Here is a brief description of the system!
Valentine’s Day

Will He Dare?


“The Koran does not have an eternal origin. It is not recorded in heaven. The Almighty God, Creator of the World, is NOT its source. It is not holy. It’s writings are human in origin, a concoction of old and new teachings. This has been stated and restated for centuries by scholars since Islam’s beginnings, both Moslem and non-Moslem”

This is the second reason given by the Dove Church of Florida. Mr. Terry seems just an outspoken person who just throws out whatever comes in his mouth and this time he has tried to spit on the sun which obviously is going to mark his own face. Let’s scan both the Holy Quran and Bible specifically the New Testament as to see which one is divine and preserved in its text. The Holy Quran which is the latest of the revealed scriptures, is the only Book that itself claims to be the original, uncorrupted Word of God. It throws down an open challenge to all the religions and their followers to prove the validity of their Books and the attributes they bestow upon them.
Now let’s have a look on the New Testament. It contains the four Gospels that are evidently a narration about the life and times of Jesus Christ. Then there are letters and accounts by the disciples of activities of the Christians of the period.
The New Testament scores very low on the above criteria. There is not a single verse that claims for the Gospels to be the Divine Word. The various Gospels contradict each other in many places. The words of the same One God should not vary no matter how often they are repeated. There is a considerable controversy about the actual authors. It is debatable whether the disciples Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were the actual authors or whether the Books written by other devotees and dedicated to the names of the famous disciples.
The Council of Nicaea played a very significant role in the development of the present day New Testament and the Christian creed. When in 308 A.D. the Roman Emperor Constantine accepted Christianity, and found that in his realms alone there were more than seven hundred different manuscripts all claiming to be the only true Gospel by Matthew.
The Emperor also realized that all these books presented a very different portrait of Jesus Christ and his teachings, peace be upon him. The followers of these individual manuscripts were so devoted to their particular books, that already contentions, riots and disturbances due to rivalry were happening between the different Christian groups in the Roman Empire.
This was rather disconcerting for the Emperor so in 325 A.D. he appointed a Council of Nicaea consisting of fifty scholars. He collected all the manuscripts that were scattered in his Empire, and handed them to the council and commissioned them to formulate an official New Testament that presented a very consistent portrait of Jesus Christ and his teachings, peace be upon him. The copies of this New Testament were placed in various centers of his Empire.
The most foul act that the Emperor and his Council did was that they destroyed all the old manuscripts that were given to them. They wanted to eliminate for good all the possible bones of contention from amongst the people, thus, attempting to secure peace within the Empire. Some manuscripts of the Gospels existed in other countries but the Council of Nicaea and the subsequent Roman hierarchy branded these as Apocrypha or unacceptable.
Even in the present times each new edition of the New or the Old Testament differs from the previous editions and because there are no originals the text only convey the interpretations of the translators colored and biased with their own beliefs, sentiments and emotions.
On the contrary the Quran was literally preserved by being written on the hearts of people, as prophesied even by the Bible:
But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days says the Lord: “I will put my law within them, and I will write it upon their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.”
(Jeremiah 31:33)
Moreover, the style in which the Quran was revealed is also in total conformity with Isaiah’s prophecy about the new law being revealed as:
For it is precept upon precept, precept upon precept, Line upon line, line upon line, here a little, there a little. Nay, but by men of strange lips and with an alien tongue, the Lord will speak to His people to whom He has said.
(Isaiah 28:10-12 Revised Standard Version Pub: Wm Collins & Sons, For British and Foreign Bible Soc. 1952)
The revelations were the actual words of God Almighty conveyed to the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, by the Archangel Gabriel. God Almighty has made a very unique promise in the Holy Quran. He says We took it upon Ourselves to reveal this scripture and We have made it Our responsibility to preserve the purity and piety of its text.
That Divine Challenge put forth almost 1400 years ago is still valid today. The very fact that no other versions of the Quran exists is overwhelming evidence of its Divine protection. M. Bucaille in his book The Bible, The Quran and Science testifies to the above facts and some excerpts from his book follow:
“If we now examine the teachings of Muslim exegetes, we shall see that they present the Qur’an in quite a different manner. About fourteen centuries ago at a meditation retreat near Mecca, Muhammad received the first message through the Archangel Gabriel. After a long period of silence, the first message was followed by successive revelations spanning a period of some twenty years. They were not only transcribed while the Prophet was still alive, but also recited by heart by his early followers and later by the many believers who had gathered around him. After his death (i~ 632 A.D.), the various elements were brought together in a book, henceforth known as The Qur’an. It contains the Word of God to the exclusion of any human addition. The manuscripts we possess from the first century of Islam authenticate today’s text.”
“Islam has its equivalent of the Gospels in the Ahadiths. These are the collected sayings of Muhammad and the story of his deeds. The Gospels are nothing other than this for Jesus. The first collections of Ahadiths were written decades after the death of Muhammad, just as the Gospels were written decades after Jesus. In both cases they bear human witness to events in the past.”
“There are no scientific errors in the Quran.”
(The Bible, The Quran, and Science, Pub. Seghers, Paris)
The absolute accuracy of the Bible can be best described by quoting from the preface of the Revised Standard Version, which describes it as the most probable reconstruction of events based on the best judgment of competent scholars.
(The Holy Bible, RSV Catholic Edition, Catholic Biblical Association of Great Britain, Pub. London Catholic Truth Society.)
The Quran, on the other hand, stands alone in its absolute authenticity. Its accuracy is beyond the slightest shadow of a doubt. This fact has been corroborated by many independent researchers and can also be verified today through comparison with one of the first written copies.
Now will Mr. Jones according to his own established rule dare to touch the Bible? (God forbids, I repeat here that we honor all the religions and their Holy Books but just to show people the real face of evil trying to create disorder in the world, had to quote such sentences.)

AGAINST BURN A QURAN DAY: A short study of the objections raised by TERRY JONES

In less than a month, Pastor Terry Jones of the Dove World Outreach Center in Florida plans to host “Burn a Quran Day” to mark the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
“ It may not cease with the holy book of the Muslims. I have always maintained that this kind of vitriolic hatred of one religion is a descent on a slippery slope, as no one can say who will be next. I was not surprised, therefore, when I heard Jones recently agree, when asked to do so in an internet podcast interview, to burn “a couple of copies of the Talmud” too, says Akbar Ahmed who is a professor and Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University in Washington.”

I will present here a short analysis of the objections and reasons given by the Church to burn the Quran. The first objection raised by Terry Jones on his blog is:

“The Koran teaches that Jesus Christ, the Crucified, Risen Son of God, King of Kings and Lord of Lords was NOT the Son of God, nor was he crucified (a well documented historical fact that ONLY Islam denies). This teaching removes the possibility of salvation and eternal life in heaven for all Islam’s believers. They face eternal damnation in hell if they do not repent”

I will take the objections one by one as that would be difficult to read for one in a single go. Now we will see if the first objection mentioned above is valid? Though the question itself seems ridiculous as all the ten objections are baseless and shows the ignorance and unawareness of Jones from the religion and Bible.
If the Holy Quran is worth burning (God forbids) due to this reason let’s have a look on the Bible what it says about the topic, if it carries the same message does that means we will celebrate a “Burn a Bible day”?Will Terry Jones go out and burn that? Though that is painful to write as we Muslims respect all the religions and their religious feelings. Let’s first take a look what Bible says about the divinity of Jesus Christ, here are a few verses from Bible which shows the oneness of God and that he has no SON.

In the Bible, it is obvious that the words, “children of your Father”, have been used metaphorically.
“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
“That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven; for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust”. (Matthew 5:44-45)
Jesus was not a physical son of God. The Bible refers to Jesus as the son of David:
“The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham”. (Matthew 1:1)
At another place, Jesus presented himself as the son of man:
“And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head”. (Matthew 8:20)
In the present day Bible, not only Jesus but also Jacob has been called the son of God. Jacob, moreover, has been referred to as “first born” son.
“And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the Lord, Israel is my son, even my first born:” (Exodus 4:22)
Jesus was not a partner in the Godhead, as was not Jacob. Both of them were beloved prophets of God.

Now lets have look on the second part of this objection put forward by Terry Jones of Dove church. Did Jesus(as) die or not let’s have a look from the biblical references.
Jesus did not die on the cross, and he was saved from the humiliation of death on the cross. The Bible says:
“he that is hanged is accursed of God”. (Deuteronomy 21:23)
Almighty God did work to save his beloved prophet from an accursed death on the cross. Jesus fervently prayed that the cup of death on the cross be removed. He said:
“O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me”. (Matthew 26:39
The Bible further informs us that these supplications were heard and accepted:
“Who in the days of flesh when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he suffered”. (Hebrews 5:7)
Jesus had predicted to give the sign of Jonas:
“But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
“For as Jonas was three days and three nights in a whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth”. (Matthew 12:39-40)
For the sign to be similar to that of Jonas, Jesus must have been alive in the sepulchre after the incident of crucifixion.
Jesus was alive when he was being taken off from the cross. A soldier pierced his side with a spear and blood and water came out which normally indicates life. The Bible says:
“But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side and forthwith came there blood and water”. (John 19:34)
Jesus met his disciples after crucifixion and assured them of his life.
“And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them then came Jesus, the doors being shut and stood in the midst, and said, ‘Peace be unto you’. Then saith he to Thomas. “Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands, and reach hither thy hand and thrust into my side and be not faithless, but believing”. (John 20:26, 27)
These are the few of a long list of the references from Bible which proves that Jesus(as) did not die on the cross but he was delivered alive from there.
Jesus was sent to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24) as he himself declared. It is historically proven that these lost Israelites had migrated to different eastern countries. Jesus in fulfillment of his heavenly mission went to the lost Israelites and conveyed his prophetic message. In Kashmir, he died a natural honorable death. His tomb, even today can be visited in Srinagar, Kashmir.
Now Mr. Terry Jones says “a well documented historical fact that ONLY Islam denies”
As it is obvious that MR. Terry is not a Christian even, as the aforesaid Biblical references show, because if he had ever read the bible he would not have said the things which even the religion he claims to represent does not support. I wonder if he has ever studied the history. I will present here an article which is a compilation of various views and opinions from scholars of the 18th to 20th centuries on Jesus (as) surviving the Crucifixion, going into a coma and being resuscitated through healing herbs.
The following eminent scholars hold that Jesus Christ (as) did not die on the Cross. You can read it below.

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/2323/the-swoon-theories/

Mullahism and COCA-COLA part 2!!!

Those mosques which have become devoid of the remembrance of Allah, the ones about which the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sa) has testified as having become abandoned and empty they refer to them as Masjids:

یَاْتِیْ عَلَی النَّاسِ زَمَانٌ لَایَبْقٰی مِنَ الْاِسْلَامِ اِلَّا اسْمُہٗ وَلَا یَبْقٰی مِنَ الْقُرْ آنِ اِلَّا رَسْمُہٗ ۔ مَسَاجِدُھُمْ عَامِرَۃٌ وَھِیَ خَرَابٌ مِّنَ الْھُدٰی ۔(مشکوٰۃ کتاب العلم فصل الثالث صفحہ38)

This is the statement of Hazrat Muhammad (sa), that a most unfortunate time is coming when all that would be left of Islam would be its name, when the Holy Quran would be there in writing alone, no attention would be paid to acting on its teachings.

مَسَاجِدُھُمْ عَامِرَۃٌ

You will see that their Masajid are full of people,

وَھِیَ خَرَابٌ مِّنَ الْھُدٰی

but they would be devoid of guidance and yet he, the Holy Prophet, still called them Masajid.

Then a patent claim would come forth from the Christians. The Jews have captured some patents but now a claim will be filed by the Christians. The Holy Quran says and accepts that the Christians were persecuted for the sake of their belief in One God… just as the Ahmadis today are persecuted for the same thing … and that they went underground. Then, finally, when they were given the good news that peace had been restored outside and your rights have been established; now without a doubt you can come above ground and it was argued as to what Memorable construction should be erected at that spot.. and the answer that the Holy Quran gives is that: (Surah Al-Kahf 18:22(

That those people who were in power to decide on the matter said:

[18:22] We shall erect a Masjid in their memory.

So the Christians will say that you have pointlessly started a dispute with regard to the use of the term, ‘Masjid’, this is in fact a Christian term, and the Holy Quran is a witness to the fact. How can you claim to be the inventors of this term? This shall be the petition of the Christians against the Muslims and on Bismillah, of course, the Jews have established authority, and what was left, ‘Masjid’ , well now that too has passed to the Christians.

Now what shall the mullahs make of things? Their petition shall be accepted and why would it be accepted? This is the question. On which side shall the Holy Quran be?

If we accept the rule that the Patent requests shall be filed according to the rules for patents, then, certainly the side on which the Holy Quran shall be, shall be the one that shall have to be accepted and, God forbid, the Quran shall be bearing witness against the Quran itself. So the truth is that this whole concept is totally repugnant and vulgar and objectionable. There is no patent in matters of faith. Every true believer invites everyone to every good deed and when a true believer adopts a good action he finds joy in so doing.

Now, look, there is the case of the Masjid Zarar. Up till today, everyone refers to it as Masjid Zarar. These mullahs when they give speeches regarding this topic, they still use the term ‘masjid zarar’ because the Holy Quran refers to it as Masjid:

(Surah At-Taubah 9:108( Never stand to pray therein. A mosque which was founded upon piety from the very first day is surely more worthy that thou shouldst stand to pray therein. In it are men who love to become purified, and Allah loves those who purify themselves.

This Masjid that they have made.. (Surah At-Taubah 9:107)

These are the people who have made this Masjid with the intention of supporting disbelief, and cause pain to the believers and to sow discord among the Muslims, even then it said you should not stand in this Masjid, the word Masjid is still, nevertheless used…it is not said that this is not a Masjid.

The Holy Quran is a Magnificent Book. The words of this Book display great courage and tolerance and vastness of Mercy in which it has enveloped the whole universe. No greater Charter of freedom of conscience has ever been issued by anyone than that contained in the Holy Quran. Go and study all the books of the world. The Charter of Freedom of Human Conscience that has been revealed to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sa), nothing like it will be found by you anywhere.

And insofar as the matter of non-Muslims greeting Muslims with As-salamo-Alaikum is concerned, it happened that some strangers, out of fear of the Muslims, when they walked by them, they greeted the Muslims with As-salamo-Alaikum… and when some Muslims reacted by saying that they want to deceive us into thinking that they are Muslims, the Quran told them to not behave in that manner. From heaven, Allah caused to descend the teaching:

Say not to anyone who greets you with the greeting of peace, ‘Thou art not a believer.’ (Surah An-Nisa 4:95)

That, look, whoever says Salam to you, you do not have the right to say to such a one that you are not a believer.

You seek the goods of this life,…by getting a hold of these people who belong to a people who are opposed to you and because you think they are doing this just to save themselves, not only has the Quran given them security against harm but by mentioning the greeting: as-salamo-alaikum has given them the right to use this greeting if they should so wish and has in its shade given them the right to save themselves by its use.

Yet, the mullahs still insist on saying that these people want to deceive the Muslims by showing themselves to be Muslims by use of this greeting.

I ask them where have you gotten this Islam? You do not understand what Islam is. This is the teaching of Allah. Allah knows best, and such incidents have come to pass in earlier times also. This is nothing new that you are presenting to us…to all such things there is an answer in the Holy Quran.

The fact of the matter now is that almost everything seems to result in blasphemy of prophethood. If any Government official says anything against the Sharia Court this results in blasphemy of Prophethood.

Now these mullahs have become God also. They have become the Prophet of Allah. If you raise a hand against them then this is considered tantamount to raising a hand against the Messenger of Allah, God forbid us from saying this!Look at their mode of life, their morals. These are the people who repulse.

Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, captured one, drew a person to himself in an extraordinary way. Whoever saw him, fell in love with him, the Promised Messiah (as) says:

اگر خواہی دلیلی عاشقش باش
محمدؐ ھست برھان محمدؐ

Why do you ask for a verifying argument, or sign, in support of the truth of Muhammad, Muhammad himself, is proof of his own beauty so ’عاشقش باش‘ fall in love with Muhammad.

محمدؐ ھست برھان محمدؐ

Muhammad is proof of Muhammad himself. May Allah give them understanding

(courtesy alfazal)

MULLAHISM and COCA-COLA!!!

Last days on some Pakistani  TV channels I saw some LEARNED scholars of Islam claiming that Muslim terminology is a PATENT trademark of Islam and no one else can use it as is the Coca-Cola and likewise, and at once the Hadith of our Holy master Muhammad (saw) flashed in my mind in which he said:

علماء ھم شرّ من تحت ادیم السماء من عندھم تخرج الفتنۃ وفیھم تعود

Do these ULMA E ISLAM have a little bit of knowledge of Islam or Quran, let it be even if they have a little common sense which one of my teachers used to say is very uncommon these days, but in the case of these FITNA GAR people it seems absolutely absent, lets have a look.

At the outset we should understand what is meant by the word ‘PATENT’. By PATENT is meant that a Company invents a certain thing and then gets this invention registered in certain required offices as a NEW INVENTION and thereby that Company receives certain protections for its newly invented thing and is granted the right to benefit from its invention and is granted the protection that without your permission no one else shall be allowed to make that thing and sell it.

This is what ‘PATENT’ means. But that thing which is already in existence, there is no restriction on its use. This is the fine point which the Pakistani intelligentsia seems to be unaware of or perhaps they are aware of this fine distinction but lack the requisite courage to give voice to this truth.

PATENT has simply to do with the process of ‘creation’ and does not extend beyond that, and so far as Islamic Terms are concerned, these were coined by Allah, the Exalted. They were not created by any mullah, nor, for that matter were they invented by some sect’s leader. If someone was going to PATENT these, it would have been God but Allah has never patented any term created by Him for any people. Indeed He is RABBUL ALAMEEN, the LORD OF ALL THE WORLDS, and has issued an open invitation to everyone. And even if there had been a PATENT it makes no sense that some would be allowed to use and others would be prohibited from use…

Islamic teachings are for the whole of humanity and the mullahs do not understand this.. it is written in the Holy Quran:

And We have sent thee not but as a mercy for all peoples. (Surah Al-Anbiya 21:108)

And the Holy Prophet Muhammad Mustafa (sa) used to dispense the teachings of doing righteous deeds openly and every person not only had the permission to make use of his teachings but rather had his invitation to do so. And this is in fact what the Holy Prophet is told to do in the Holy Quran:

Say, ‘O People of the Book! come to a word equal between us and you  (Surah Ale-Imran 3:65)

There is no PATENT, we invite you to those values that are common between you and us, in those let us cooperate and collaborate with each other. You cooperate with us and we will work together with you. This is the meaning of rahmat-al-lil-alameen the vastness of which extends to all the worlds. There is no meanness of sight here nor straitened hearts, the bounties of God are there open for all to benefit from. It is not clear from where these people have learned this type of Islam and it is such a shame that they are teaching the hapless Pakistanis this interpretation of Islam .I do not know who they are copying.

Never till today has there ever been a discussion of PATENT in the history of Islam. These are the same mullahs that have been fighting with each other all their lives. Have they forgotten, why do they not remember? The Ahmadis are not just at issue here. There is a difference on every matter between all of them. Up till today they have not settled the issue of BASHAR or NOOR [whether the Holy Prophet was a human being in nature or light], so where will they go to get the PATENT issued from? Who will they go and ask? And for whom will they go and get the PATENT? And what is it exactly that is to be PATENTED and who has the right on this and which office is established to issue such a patent?

If the Government of Pakistan wishes to issue the PATENT then it must first make an OFFICE for the issuance of such Patents for the religions and let all the religions submit their requests to this office to be granted the patent for the use of such and such religious terms for themselves. In this case the rule of patents is that whoever shall be proved to have first invented the thing, whoever shall be proved to have used the thing for the very first time that one shall be granted the patent.

If Pakistan should open such a Patent Office, the first to arrive shall be the Jews and they will say that Hazrat Ibrahim (as) was the Founder of our faith and your Holy Quran testifies to this that the word, ‘Islam’ was first used for Hazrat Ibrahim (as), so was the case for the word, ‘Muslim’

ولکٰن کان حنیفا مسلما..(Surah Ale-Imran 3:68( “Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was Haneef and Muslim.

Now, the question is: This is the demand of a patent from the Jews so how will the PATENT OFFICE OF PAKISTAN reject this? And if, once this term is patented, then neither Christians shall be able to call themselves Muslim, nor shall the Muslims be able to call themselves Muslims. All will have a restriction, they will first have to go to the Jews and get their permission then they can call themselves Muslims.

The question is why should we seek permission from the Jews? This indeed is the fundamental question.

These terms are God’s terms and Allah, the Exalted, tells us that every good thing is for the whole of humanity without restriction. There is no restriction in anyone copying any good thing, rather Islam invites towards this. Allah, the Exalted, says: ma kana Ibraheemo yahoodiyan wa la nasraniyan wa lakin kana haneefan muslayma..(Surah Ale-Imran 3:68) he was a Muslim.

Then Allah, the Exalted, says: ربنا واجعلنا۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:129)

that Ibraheem prays with Hazrat Ismael that O Our Lord! Make of us, two Muslims..wa min dhurriyyatana.. and from our progeny similarly keep on making Muslims.. ummatan muslimatan lak.. this ummat-e-muslayma will be for you..

Actually, our belief is that the time of the Holy Prophet, his epoch, comprehends all time-spans.. but I am responding in the language and logic of the mullahs that all the 
progeny of Hazrat Ibraheem (as) even before the advent of the Holy Prophet, that they were all Muslims as per the Holy Quran. The Patent Office of Pakistan will have to enter into its records that this is their right and in the future without their permission no one shall have the right to call him or her self a Muslim…

It is the Ummat of Ibraheem that is Muslim, so whoever shall ascribe himself to Ibraheem (as) that one shall have the right to call himself a Muslim and no power on earth can stop him.. and in any case this whole talk reeks of ignorance.

The Queen said, “Ye chiefs, there has been delivered to me a noble letter. It is from Solomon, and it is: In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful;” (Surah An-Naml 27:30-31)

So here we are, here is another patent that the Jews have. So the next petition of the Jews shall be that we in fact are Muslims and Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem belongs to us.

The Ahmadis are beaten and tortured for the crime of writing Bismillah hir Rahman nir Raheem. They are dragged to the courts and handed down punishments. This is a crime as per the statutes of Pakistan and so far as Patents are concerned this is a patent that belongs to the Jews because the letter that Hazrat Suleiman sent to Queen Saba this was written upon it, as we read in the Holy Quran:

And then what does the letter invite to, to become a Muslim:

That come to me having become a Muslim. (Surah An-Naml 27:32)

Now, Ahmadies cannot call a Masjid [mosque] a Masjid.. so what shall they call it? is it too a PATENT of ISLAM??

To be continued…….

KAFIRPHOBIA conclusion!!

Here are the few remaining Muslims who also are declared as KAFIRS, may Allah bless the UMMAH and open their eyes to see the truth and true nature of these MULLAHS(شر من تحت عدیم السما)…..

Shi’as

Shi’as about whom the ulema of the generality of Muslims have warned in the following hair-raising words:

“The definitive, unequivocal, degree by general consensus against these Raafizis and Tabarra’is is that these are, in general, kaafir and murtad; the animal slaughtered at their hands (For consumption) is to be considered carrion. Inter-marriage with them is not only unlawful (haraam) but unmitigated fornication. God forbid, if the man is Raafzi and the woman (married to him) is Muslim, this exemplifies the wrath of God. If the man be Sunni and the woman involved belongs to these despicable evil ones, even then marital accord will not be legitimate in fact it will be only formalized fornication, and the resulting progeny will consist of bastards—to be deprived of receiving inheritance from the father, because even though the resulting progeny will be Sunni but, according to the Shariah, it cannot be the beneficiary of the father’s inheritance. As to the woman, she will neither be the beneficiary of inheritance nor receive her dower money (mehr) because there cannot be any mehr for an adulteress. A Raafzi cannot receive inheritance from anyone whosoever, not even from his father. Not to speak of being the beneficiary of any Sunni’s left over inheritance, a Raafzi cannot inherit from any Muslim at all, not even from a kaafir; so much so that a Raafzi cannot have any right, in principle, to inherit anything from his own co-religionist Raafzi. Social interaction, or offering customary salutation to any of their men or women, scholar or ignorant, is an unlawful (haraam) act of the highest order. Anyone who, after being apprised of their accursed set of beliefs, still considers them to be Muslim or entertains any doubt about their being kaafir such a one is himself a kaafir and an irreligious one, according to the consensus of all Imams of our religion, and all the provisions of the aforesaid decree are equally applicable to such a person. It is obligatory on every Muslim to conscientiously pay heed to this fatwa and become true and devoted Sunni by carrying out this

fatwa.”

[Fatwa by Maulana Shah Mustafa Reza Khan, quoted in booklet Radd-ur-Rafazah, p. 23, published by Noori Kutub Khana, Bazaar Daata Sahib, Lahore, Pakistan; printed by Gulzaar-e-Aalam Press, outside Bhaati Gate, Lahore, 1320 Hijra]

Jama‘at-e-Islami

Jama‘at-e-Islami about whom the Barelvi and Deobandi ulema, alike, have given definitive fataawa of the following kind:

“After perusing the excerpts from the books of Maudoodi Sahib, it became apparent that his ideas consist of blaspheming the leaders of Islam as well as the venerable Prophets. There is no doubt about his being one who has strayed (dhaall) and also the misleader (mo’dhill). I implore all the Muslims to stay away from his beliefs and ideas, and not regard him as a servant of Islam, and not be in any doubt concerning him The Holy Prophet(sa) prophesied that prior to the appearance of the real dajjaal, thirty other dajjaals will be born who will clear the way for this dajjaal. In my opinion, Maudoodi is one of those thirty dajjaals.

Wassalam, Muhammad Sadiq, Manager, Madrasa Mazher-ul-Uloom, Mohalla Khadda, Karachi, 28 Zil Hijjeh, 1371 Hijra, 19 September, 1952. [Quoted in: Haq Parast Ulema ki Maudoodiyyat say Naaraazgi kay Asbaab (sic. "The Reasons for the Righteous Ulema's Disenchantment with Maudoodian Creed," p. 97; compiled by Maulvi Ahmad Ali, Anjuman Khuddaam-ud- Din, Lahore]


The President of Jamee’at-e-Ulama-e-Islam, Hadhrat Maulana Mufti Mahmood, stated:

“I hereby issue this fatwa in the Press Club, Hyderabad, that Maudoodi is one who has strayed (gum raah), kaafir, and outside the pale of Islam. it is illegitimate (na jaa’iz) and haraam for anyone to pray behind him, or behind any Maulvi who belongs to his group. Having any affiliation with his group is certainly kufr (disbelief) and going astray (dhalaalah). He is an agent of America and the capitalist forces. He has now reached the precipice of death, and no power can now save him: his deathknell will necessarily sound shortly.”

[Quoted in the Weekly Zindegi, 10 November, 1969, from Jamee'at Guard, Lyallpur]

Ahrari

The  Ahrari ulema about whom the “insider’s-account,” given so eloquently by Maulvi Zafar Ali Khan, proclaims that these people are not simply “averse to Islam”: they are indeed the “traitors to Islam.” Please read on (translated from Urdu poem):

Averse they are to the understanding of Divine Laws;

Averse they are to Islam, and Faith, and righteous conduct

Averse, indeed, to the One Who Safeguards the integrity and honour of the Holy Prophet;

Coalescing with kaafirs, while showing aversion to the Muslims!

And still they claim to be the Ahrar of Islam?

What ‘Ahrar?’ They are nothing but Traitors to Islam!

The Ahrar of Punjab are Traitors to Islam!

These wretched people are ignorant of the civilization of Arabia;

Nor do they fear the wrath of Allah, the Exalted

Their sole objective is to somehow occupy a Ministry in the Government by hook or by crook;

They have nothing to do with the King of Medina (peace be on him) The Ahrar of Punjab are Traitors to Islam!

[Newspaper, Zameendaar, 21 October, 1945, p.6]

Conclusion

The foregoing posts consisted of only a few excerpts from numerous lengthy edicts (fataawa) for illustrative purposes only and I assure you there are thousands of the kind, not one sect, I repeat not one single sect is out of  this Kafir sickness.

How far such conduct is becoming of a Muslim; how far does it behove any humble follower of the one who was “Mercy for the Universe”? If one does offer prayers behind them, one is branded as kaafir; if one does not offer prayers behind them, one is still branded as kaafir! It is a no-win situation. What is one supposed to do? Is the only way left for one to retain Islam as his faith is to abstain altogether from offering prayer in congregation as the majority among the generality of Muslim has already done?

The sum total of the decrees issued by the ulema of this age seems to be: give up offering daily-prayers, if you want to retain your identity as a Muslim; otherwise, regardless of who you pray behind, you will be determined to be a certified kaafir and Hellbound.

As Aatish, the poet, remarked:

Unless one courts one’s early death,

What else is left for one to do?

Some wise-man wrote the following sardonic fable to illustrate such a notion of “justice.” A little lamb was once drinking water at a stream when he was approached by a wolf who had come from upstream. The wolf chided the little lamb: “Didn’t you know that I was also drinking water, then how did you dare to muddy the waters I was drinking from?” Poor lamb managed to say, “Sir, I was drinking at the downstream, so I could not have muddied your waters upstream which is where you were drinking.” The wolf became enraged and said, “You have the nerve to talk back and call me a liar? It will serve the purpose of justice if I tear you to pieces and eat you up.” You should instill some fear of God in the minds of these ulema. When you read this fable of the wolf and the little lamb, you are sometimes moved to pity for the little lamb and sometimes you get angry at the action of the wolf. But right now, in front of your very eyes, it is not lambs but human beings who are being subjected to the same treatment. This is not happening in any fable, this persecution is being re-played in the form of a tragic reality, in everyday life, in your own society. But you do not utter a single word of protest against it! For God’s sake at least do this much: tell these ulema that if they are determined to stay this course of coercion, and adhere to this Law of the Jungle, and if your apparent material strength has proudly decided to recklessly trample the injunctions of justice laid down by God Almighty, then they must at least have the sense of decorum to not embroil the sacred name of Islam in this matter. At least have the courtesy of not implicating the honour and integrity of the Holy Prophet(sa) in this conflict.

When you are bent upon achieving your self-styled objectives even at the cost of compromising Islamic values of equity and justice then forget about your so-called “arguments,” and clutching at the straws. Have the audacity to enter the arena of Karbala and relentlessly carry out whatever suits your fancy. And see for yourselves on whose side the God of Islam is, and also the Messenger of Islam? And who it is that would emerge out of this mill of trials and tribulations and would be proven to be the true, sincere and completely devoted servant of Hadhrat Muhammad, the chosen one(sa), who is infused with his boundless love!!!

kAFIRPHOBIA part 2!!

Muslim Ulema who claim to devote their lives to serve Islam here are some samples of heir services. The most popular pastime of the Muslim divines in Pakistan or I guess all over the world is to somehow have all the Muslims declared to be a non-Muslim minority. To this end, a plethora of such literature is published which is short on arguments and very long on inflammatory and baseless allegations and unmitigated invective. There are a number of fataawa issued by the eminently regarded, renowned, high-ranking religious scholars, in which almost each sect of Muslims have been declared a KAFIR , I am presenting here a few of them censoring the stuff and choosing some which have comparatively readable language though I myself doubt my statement of declaring them civilized.

You be the judge:

Fatwa Against Wahhabis – Deobandis

“Wahhabis – Deobandis are decisively murtad (apostate) and kaafir (disbeliever) on account of profaning and blaspheming, in their writings, all the saints and Prophets, including even the Chief of the Earlier ones and the Latter ones (sa), and particularly for doing the same to God, the Exalted and Glorious. Their apostasy has degenerated to such a great, great, great degree of utmost kufr (disbelief) that if someone were to even slightly doubt the apostacy and disbelief of these apostates and disbelievers, then he himself qualifies as an apostate and a disbeliever—and a person who has a doubt about the consequent disbelief of the said doubter, such a one, too, will become an apostate and a disbeliever. The Muslims will be well-advised to completely avoid them and abstain from associating with them altogether………Do not eat any meat from an animal slaughtered by them; do not participate socially in their festivities or mourning occasions; do not allow them to visit you; do not visit them to enquire about their health if they fall sick; do not participate in committing their dead bodies to the burial ground, in the event of their death; do not give them any space in the graveyards of Muslims. In other words, you must completely avoid and shun them….

“The issuers of the fatwa are not just the ulema of India. In fact when the writings of the Wahhabis – Deobandis, were translated and sent abroad, the ulema of Afghanistan, Khewa, Bukhaara, Iran, Egypt, Rome, Syria, Mecca Mu’azzamah, Medina Munawwarah, etc., the entire Arabian lands, and Koofa and Baghdad Shareef, in other words the ulema of the Ahle Sunnah denomination from all over the world, have unanimously given the same aforementioned fatwa.”

[From: Muhammad Ibrahim Bhagal Puri; published under the auspices of Sheikh Shaukat Hussain, manager, Hasan Burqi Press, Ishtiaq Manzil, No. 63 Hewett Road, Lucknow. The year of publication is not mentioned on this fatwa which originated before the creation of Pakistan in 1947]

Fataawa issued by Maulvi Abdul Karim Naji Daghistani, from Haram Shareef, Mecca:

“They are immoral kaafirs. A Muslim monarch, who has the judicial punitive authority to award capital punishment, is under obligation to kill them their execution being preferable to killing a thousand kaafirs, because these indeed are the truly accursed ones, who fall in line with the evil ones. So, therefore, the curse of God be on them and may God’s blessings and mercy be on those who abandon them due to their perversities.”

[From: Fazil-e-Kamil, Neko Khasa'il, Sahib-e-Faiz-e-Yazdani, Maulvi Abdul Karim Naji Daghistani, Haram Shareef, Mecca. Quoted in Hisaam-ul-Hermayin ala Munhar al-Kufr wa al-Mayn, pp. 176-179, authored by Maulana Ahmad Reza Khan Barelvi; published by Ahle Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah, Barelvi, 1324-1326 Hijra, 1906 1908 A.D.]

Ahle Hadith

Then, Ahle Hadith, about whom the Barelvi Imams have warned us in unequivocal terms that:

“The Wahhabis etc., the contemporary Moqallideen, are kaafir and murtad by the consensus of the ulema of Hermayen Shareefayen [sic. Mecca and Medina], of such a degree that, after being apprised of their accursed statements, if someone still does not consider them to be kaafir or even if he as much as doubts it then he himself is a kaafir. Any prayer offered behind them is without any validity, whatsoever. Eating from the meat of an animal slaughtered by them is haraam (unlawful). Their wives have fallen out of wedlock with them. They cannot marry any Muslim, kaafir, or murtad. Socialising with them, having meals together, giving them company, uttering common salutations these are all unlawful (haraam) acts. Detailed injunctions about these are contained in the valuable book, Hisaam-ul-Hermayin Shareef. And Allah, the Exalted knows most of all.

[Fataawa Sanaiyya, vol. 2, p.409; compiled by Al-Haaj Maulana Muhammad Daood Raaz, Khateeb Jami'a Ahle Hadith; published by Maktebah Isha'at-e-Deeniyat, Mohanpura, Bombay, India]

Barelvis

Now, Barelvis about whom the renowned Deobandi scholar Maulvi Sayyed Hussain Ahmad Madni, former Senior Professor, Daar-ul-Uloom Deoband, has said as under:

“All these issuances of the edicts of disbelief and the invocations of curses will boomerang upon Barelvi, and his followers, at their time of death in order to commence their torment in their graves, and be the cause of the nullification of their faith and effacing of their earlier affirmations of truth and certitude. Because the angels will say to the Holy Prophetsa: [sic. Thou certainly knowest not what hath they wrought in thy absence]. And the Holy Prophetsa shall say about Dajjaal Barelvi and his followers: Grind them to dust! And he will deny them access to the renowned Pond (Kauthar) and also to his benevolent intercession and will spurn them as creatures even lower than dogs. And they shall be deprived of the spiritual reward and recompense of the Muslim ummah, and its degrees of ranks and Divine favours.”

[Rojoom-ul-Muznibeen ala Ro'oos-al-Shayateen, a.k.a. Al- Shahaab-us-Saa'qib ala al-Mustariq-ul-Kaazib, p. 111, by Maulvi Syyed Hussain Ahmad Madni, Publisher: Kutub Khaana I'azaaziyya, Deoband, District Saharan Pur, India]

Pervezis and Chakrhalvis

The  Pervezis and Chakrhalvis, concerning whom the unanimously held fataawa of the ulema of Barelvi, Deobandi, and Maudoodi orientation are as under:

“The Chakrhalvi school of thought is sworn enemy of the blessed Ahadith of the Holy Prophet(sa), and negates his status and rank, and his position in the Shariah. These unabashed rebels against the Messenger of God have established a strong front against the Messenger. Do you not know what is the punishment for one who is guilty of high-treason? Only a bullet!”

[Weekly, Rizwaan, Lahore (Chakrhalviyyet Number) a religious organ of Ahle Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah, p. 3, February 21-28, 1953. Printer: Syeed Mahmood Ahmad Rizvi, Co-operative Capital Printing Press, Lahore. Office of Rizwaan, interior Dehli Darwaaza, Lahore, Pakistan]

An organ of Jama‘at-e-Islami, Tasneem, contained this fatwa:

“…. If those who give this advice imply that Shariah only comprises of the Holy Quran, and the rest is not Shariah then this is definitely kufr (disbelief), and very much like the kufr of Qadianis albeit much more hardened and intense.”

[Article by Maulana Ameen Ahsan Islaahi; the Daily Tasneem, Lahore, 15 August, 1952, 
p.12]

leaving the rest for the next page…u can read the rest in the next post!

KAFIRPHOBIA!!

Someone walking in a peace rally is KAFIR

Someone sitting in a park is a KAFIR!

Islam is embroiled in a variety of severe dangers in this age that is characterized as the Latter Days. Anti- Islamic powers whether they are of eastern or western hemisphere are engaged in assailing Islam in different ways. It is the most painful reality that, in this age, it is the Islamic munitions that are being employed to attack Islam, and the attack on Islam is being undertaken in the name of Islam. The sword of the Islamic world is being drawn against the world of Islam, and the daggers of the Islamic world are being used to stab the world of Islam in the chest.

By any standard of justice, anyone who claims to be a Muslim should be considered one. ‘Muslim’ literally means one who ‘submits to the will of God’. However, Muslim scholars have passed uncountable edicts of heresy against other fellow Muslims in recent times. It confuses an observer as to what yardstick is used to gauge a Muslim’s faith in Islam. Is there a basis for some Muslims considering other Muslims ‘not Muslims’? Let us open Scripture to learn how the word is defined.

A Muslim is an adherent of the religion of Islam” says Wikipedia. Another prominent Islamic website defines a Muslim as a person who says, “There is no God but One God (Allah) and Mohammed [pbuh] is a messenger of God.” This declaration is known as the ‘Kalima’ and is considered the primary pillar of the Islamic faith.
Almost all online sources state the same thing  that the belief in the Kalima is what makes one a Muslim. Despite the fact that a simple definition as this is presented to the world, the practice of pronouncing a rival sect as “kafir” [heretic] is way too common in the Muslim world. Sunni Clerics have, for ages, given edicts of heresy against the Shia and vice versa. Brelvis have considered Deobandis as heretics and the same is true the other way round. Ahmadis have been outlawed in Pakistan and labeled non-Muslims by Constitution. Do all these sects not proclaim the Kalima?

The definition in the Holy Prophet’s sacred words that we have found, which has the greatest level of generality and is the broadest one and on the basis of

which it is impossible for a person, who is called a Muslim, to declare another Muslim to be an Kafir, unless the latter himself recants Islam by his own formal declaration is as follows:

“The Holy Prophetsa said:

‘Write down for me the name of every such individual who claims to be a Muslim by the word of his own mouth.’

(Sahih Bukhari, Kitabul Jihadi Wassiyar, Babu Kitabatil Imaminnasa, Hadith No. 3060. See also Sahih Muslim, Kitabul Iman, Babu Jawazil Istisrari Bil Imani Lil Kha’ifi, Hadith No. 377)

The context of this Hadith was the occasion when the Holy Prophet sa ordered a census in Medina. Since, a census, by its very nature, is a broad ranging entity, the most broad-ranging definition by him was given in the context of that particular occasion. He did not allow dabbling into any contentious issue—he did not even mention the Kalima—and said that, as far as the general census of population and national political realm is concerned, only this much is adequate by way of a definition that whoever calls himself a Muslim, you should record the name of all such individuals for me. The phrase “for me” is a beautiful expression and it signifies: this definition ‘will be acceptable to me’, regardless of whether or not it is acceptable to thousands of other people. For me for Muhammad (saw) who has been appointed as the Messenger (saw) of Allah only this general definition is adequate that a person declares himself to be a Muslim
. In another definition, by comparison, has a greater religious flavor. But this, too, is so simple, so transparent, so beautiful and so unambiguous that after listening to even this definition there does not remain any basis for contention. He said:

“Whoever observes Prayer in the same way as we do, and declares our qibla to be his qibla [i.e., faces the same direction in Prayer as we do]; one who eats from our dhabiha [i.e., the meat of our slaughtered animals] such a one is a Muslim. To protect such a person is a matter of obligation for God and His Messenger. So, [O ye Muslims!] make sure that you do not violate the obligation from God.”

(Sahih Bukhari, Kitabus Salat, Babu Fadli Istiqbalil Qiblati, Hadith No. 391.)

What a magnificent, how clear, and how beautiful is this definition! Now, look at how the ulema in Pakistan are today showing the audacity to formulate a definition that is diametrically opposite to the above definition. In this day and age, hundreds of Ahmadis have been persecuted, jailed, and the ulema have issued openly provocative fatwas to murder them. They have proclaimed that the Ahmadis observe Prayers like us and in so doing they face the same qibla as we do, and they eat from the dhabiha like we do. Yet, until and unless the Ahmadis desist from these three actions, we will not discharge our obligation of protecting them. And the day they abandon these three acts, they would instantly become part of those whom we are obliged to protect and give their civil rights to.

Was this the obligation that was mentioned by the Holy Prophet sa? By taking a position directly opposed to, and by contradicting every clause and proviso of the obligation laid down by God and the Messenger sa of God, these ulema have formulated a new obligation for themselves. They have invented a new definition of a Muslim, and their demands that the Ahmadi mosques should be demolished and that Ahmadis must be forced to face a direction other than that of Ka‘ba, seems to indicate that they have, in effect, appointed a new qibla, and have suggested to Ahmadis to follow a new mode of worship!

In another Hadith:

“Hadrat Usamara relates: We went on a sariyya (a military expedition, unaccompanied by the Holy Prophet(sa) and mounted an early morning attack on the al-Huruqat region of the Juhaina tribe. I encountered a man and, when I got the better of him, he recited the Kalima, ‘There is none worthy of worship, except Allah.’(This Hadith only mentions his recital of the part La ilaha illAllah, i.e., ‘There is none worthy of worship except Allah’—he had not even uttered the remainder, Muhammadur Rasulullah, i.e., ‘Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.) but I still killed him. This pricked my conscience, and when I returned to Medina I related the incident to the Holy Prophet (saw). He  replied, “O Usama! Did you kill him despite his reciting La ilaha illAllah?” I submitted, “O

Messenger of Allah! but he recited La ilaha illAllah due to his fear of the weapons and for fear of getting killed.” The Holy Prophet (saw) exclaimed, “Why did you not cut open his [chest to look at his] heart so that you could ascertain whether he had recited it due to fear or whether it was a heartfelt recital?” Thereafter he said, “On the day of Judgment, what would be your response to La ilaha illAllah?” I submitted, “O Messenger of Allah! Please say istighfar* for me.” But he continued to repeat his remark time and again—so much so that I wished that I had not become a Muslim prior to that day, [so as to escape this occasion of being the recipient of such displeasure of the Holy Prophet (saw)].

(Sahih Muslim, Kitabul Imani, Babu Tahrimi Qatlil Kafiri Ba‘da Qaulihi: La ilaha illAllah, Hadith No. 277, 278, 279.)

Today, the definition being given runs counter even to this third definition. How is it possible that this Hadith escaped the attention of the Ulema? Today, the ulema are openly proclaiming that any Ahmadi, who recites La ilaha illAllah, would deserve to be put to death. We cannot tolerate it, under any circumstance, that an Ahmadi may recite La ilaha illAllah, or that he may go round wearing a badge of La ilaha illAllah on his lapel. The fatwas have gone to such limits as to declare that: ‘if now we ever caught any Ahmadi in the act of reciting La ilaha illAllah, we will dismember his nose and ears!’ Some fatwas have gone to the extent of declaring that it becomes obligatory upon every Muslim to kill any such Ahmadi who recites La ilaha illAllah, Muhammadur Rasulullah. And the argument they advance in support of their position is the one that has already been rejected by the Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw). Their argument is: we prescribe this because La ilah illAllah does not reside in their hearts; it only flows upon their tongues. It is astonishing. Such an act of transgression against that Spiritual Master (saw) whose devotional servitude they continue to profess. This constitutes an open revolt, and they insist on continuing in this rebellion. And, due to this rebellion, they practice such high-handedness and persecution that they are forcing the government authorities that they should follow the lead of the ulema and officially declare the legitimacy of a general massacre of all those Ahmadis who proclaim to adhere to La ilaha illAllah, Muhammadur Rasulullah—i.e., ‘There is none worthy of worship except Allah, Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.’

According to the Constitution of Pakistan:

“A ‘Muslim’ means a person who believes in the unity and oneness of Allah, in the absolute and unqualified finality of the Prophet hood of the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, and does not believe in, or recognize as a prophet or religious reformer, any person who claimed or claims to be a prophet, in any sense of the word or of any description whatsoever, after Muhammad.
This new definition, it is obvious, has been manufactured just to outlaw the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. Many Pakistanis and some other Muslims suggest that Ahmadis are non-Muslims. Whereas this is true according to the Constitution of the country, it is against the constitution set forth by Muhammad [pbuh]. Ignoring the definition of Islam and inventing new ones has only created problems. For instance, what the Muslims of Pakistan do not realize is the fact that they have all been conferred a ‘non-Muslim’ status according to this new rendering.

It is an established fact that a large majority of Muslims traditionally await the second advent of the Messiah [Jesus]. However, since he was a prophet on his appearance in Israel two millenniums back, according to the opinion of Muslim scholars, he shall continue to be honored as one on his second advent. It is also argued by them that rejecting him on his second advent is tantamount to apostasy.

The Constitution of Pakistan demands that any person who follows someone who claims to be a prophet in any sense of the word or of any description after Prophet Muhammad [pbuh] is not a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution or Law of Pakistan. Now, since Jesus is believed to come after Muhammad [pbuh], he would either have to deny his station as a prophet or else be considered a non Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution and Law of Pakistan. On the other hand, if he repudiated his prophet hood on his second advent to be classified as a Muslim in Pakistan, he would, in the opinion of the Pakistani mullah become an apostate.

It also needs to be considered that the common Pakistani Muslims would find themselves in a quagmire. If they accepted Jesus’s prophet hood on his second advent after Muhammad [pbuh], they would begin to be considered non Muslims since the said amendment demands that any person who recognizes a prophet in any sense of the word or of any description after Prophet Muhammad is not a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution and Law of Pakistan. On the other hand, if they deny his prophet hood on his second advent, they will be considered apostate in view of the edicts by the Pakistani clerics.

If the clerics of Pakistan once again decide to ignore Islamic belief and decide that Jesus would not be a prophet on his return, he still will be considered an old prophet and a religious reformer. The words of the constitution, “a prophet in any sense of the word or of any description” and “a religious reformer” will come to haunt them once again. Jesus will have to accept a non Muslim status or seek asylum outside the country. Pakistanis will be left with a choice to reject either him or the Muslim status. This dilemma needs to be solved by Pakistan before Jesus decides to descend. The only way to do so is to return to the definition of Muhammad [pbuh].

The Holy Quran states: “Say not to anyone who greets you with the greeting of peace, Thou art not a believer.” In Pakistan, an Ahmadi Muslim not only gets to be declared a non-believer for saying the greeting of peace, he is thrown behind bars for three years. This again is a part of the country’s legislation. It is up to the Pakistani people to decide which constitution they have more faith in, the constitution of Islam or that of Pakistan, the legislation of Muhammad [pbuh] or of the Mullahs of Pakistan.

Ahmadi Muslims proclaim that “There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger” and believe in the five pillars of Islam. Can anyone explain from scripture how they become non-Muslims? If you quote the Pakistani Constitution as evidence, then you must accept your own position as non-Muslim. May the Islam of Muhammad [pbuh] be followed. May sanity prevail.

in the next chapter some sample verdicts of KUFR will be published to let muslims know if any muslim is alive on the face of the earth according to the ULEMA of ISLAM??

At laaaast all the Muslims are KAFIRS due to some or another reason!!!!

The Ultimate Islamic Philosophy!!

Islam is Peace not Suicide bombing…

The word Islam derives from a root which means “peace” and“submission.” It Is interpreted as meaning the attainment of peace through submission to the will of God, that is, through conformity to Divine law and guidance. In the Islamic concept, Divine law includes all law governing and regulating the universe. Peace and order are deemed essential for material, moral, and spiritual progress. Among the attributes of God, the Quran mentions that He is

“the Source of Peace and the Bestower of Security” (59:24).

The establishment of peace and the maintenance of security must, therefore, be the constant objective of mankind. The Muslim greeting in all parts of the world is:

“Peace be on you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.”

Every pursuit and activity which has a tendency to disturb the peace is severely condemned.

“Do not promote disorder in the earth after peace has been established” (7:56⎯57).

“Do not go about committing iniquity in the earth and causing disorder” (7:75; 11:86; 29:37).

“Seek not to create disorder in the earth. Verily, God loves not those who seek to create disorder” (28:78).

No finer example exists than that shown by the Prophet himself. When the Prophet announced his mission to the people of Mecca, who had known him as a honest, upright, and faithful comrade, the announcement was received with incredulity. His persistence in the assertion of his claim and in calling men to the worship of One God and to a moral and spiritual revolution in their lives at first drew only ridicule. When here and there his call began to evoke a favourable response, the ridicule turned into harassment. During ten long years the Prophet and his small but slowly increasing band of companions were subjected to cruel and merciless persecution. They bore it all with patience and dignity under the most difficult conditions. Neither abuse nor persecution could provoke them into conduct unbecoming orderly, law-abiding citizens. Except for a vehement repudiation of idol worship and persistence in proclaiming and upholding the Unity of God, neither the Prophet himself nor any member of the small Muslim community in Mecca appears ever to have attempted to defy the authority of the assembly of Elders, or the rules and conventions regulating the conduct and behaviour of the citizens of Mecca. When the persecution became almost unendurable, the Prophet, rather than risk a state of civil disorder in the town, counselled that some Muslims should leave Mecca and seek asylum in the neighbouring state of Ethiopia, across the Red Sea. Later, other Muslims, including the Prophet himself, migrated to Medina. The Meccan period of the Prophet’s ministry is an outstanding example of the upholding of law and order by a hard-pressed and sorely persecuted group, whose membership was constantly growing and whose strength was increasing. Though Islam has always stood uncompromisingly on the Unity of God, the Muslims were admonished not to use harsh language against the idols worshiped by Meccans lest the latter, out of spite and ignorance, be provoked into blaspheming Allah, in Whom they themselves professed belief.

“And abuse not those whom they call upon beside Allah,lest they out of spite,abuse Allah in their ignorance. Thus unto every people have We caused their doings to seem fair” (6:109).

The principle stressed here is that even false doctrines and unsocial and destructive ideas, so long as they are believed in and adhered to, must be taken into account as having an appeal to those who entertain them; all conduct which is likely to cause provocation should be avoided.

In the domain of international relations, religion and inter-religious relations occupy a very important position. Unfortunately, comparatively little attention is paid today to this aspect of human relations. It is assumed that religion is a private matter for each individual and, therefore, should have no direct connection with the political, social, or economic aspects of life which directly affect the relations not only of individuals, but of groups, communities, and nations with each other. This assumption is not justifiable. Religion is a vital factor in the field of human relations and there is good ground for hope that it might progressively become more effective in promoting unity and accord rather than continue to be a source of friction and conflict. It is important, therefore, to ascertain what attitude Islam adopts toward other faiths and their followers. The Quran teaches that God has sent His revelation to all peoples from time to time and that no section of mankind has been left without Divine guidance (35:25⎯26).

Many of the prophets of the Old Testament are mentioned by name in the Quran, and so also is Jesus, who with the other prophets is honoured and revered by the Muslims (2:137). Indeed, the Quran requires belief in the truth and righteousness of all the prophets and in the revelations that were vouchsafed to them by God. The Torah and the revelation that came to Jesus are repeatedly mentioned as sources of guidance and light (5:45, 47).

Thus Islam seeks to bring about reconciliation between the followers of different faiths and to establish a basis of respect and honour among them. It holds out to them the hand of co-operation and friendship on a basis of righteousness.

“Surely, those who have believed, and the Jews, and the Sabaeans, and the Christians, whoso believes in God and the Last Day, and acts righteously, on them shall come no fear nor shall they grieve” (5:70).

Islam stands emphatically for freedom of conscience. Everyone must make his choice, and accept or reject in absolute freedom whatever he chooses to believe in or to deny.

“There is no compulsion in matters of faith, for surely guidance has been made manifest and distinct from error” (2:257).

As this verse stresses, there can be no compulsion in matters of faith, because faith and belief are matters of conscience, and conscience cannot be compelled. A person could perhaps be compelled to say that he believes in a certain doctrine, but he cannot be compelled to believe in it. Besides, it is pointed out that no compulsion is needed. Guidance and error have been clearly set forth, and everyone must make his choice after due reflection and deliberation. Clear directions have been given with regard to the manner in which the message of Islam is to be conveyed to mankind.

“Say, ‘This is my way: I call unto Allah on the basis of understanding, I and those who follow me’” (12:109).

It was the duty of the Prophet and of each one of his companions, as indeed it is the duty of every Muslim all the time, to invite people to the acceptance of the Truth, both by precept and by example, but the precept and the example must be such as to preclude the remotest suspicion of any pressure or coercion.

“Call unto the way of thy Lord with wisdom and kindly exhortation, and reason with them in the way that is best. Surely thy Lord knows best who has strayed from His way; and He knows best those who are rightly guided” (16:126).

If these principles were unreservedly accepted and fully acted upon by Muslim and non-Muslim alike, inter-religious relations would be lifted from the plane of controversy, which often engenders misunderstanding and irritation, to the level of a reasoned and respectful appreciation of beneficent values wherever they may be found. Such a consummation is devoutly to be wished for and should be fervently welcomed.

Islam draws attention to factors which tend to disturb or destroy peace and order, and deprecates them. Some of these may be briefly considered. Domination of one group by another in the domestic sphere or of one people by another in the international sphere is a potent cause of disturbance of peace, and is strongly condemned. God does not approve of the division of His creatures into groups for the purpose of domination of some by others. In this connection, the instance of Pharaoh and his treatment of the people of Israel is cited as an example.

“Pharaoh behaved arrogantly in the land and divided the people thereof into sections; he sought to weaken one section, slaying their male children, and sparing their female children. Certainly he was of the workers of evil. We desired to show favour unto those who have been reduced into the position of subordinates in the land and to make them leaders and to make them inheritors of Our favours and to establish them in the land” (28:5—7).

Pharaoh’s end and that of his nobles and courtiers became a terrible lesson for all succeeding generations (10:91⎯93).

Economic exploitation of one people or country by another inevitably leads to domination by the exploiters, and develops into a threat to peace. The Quran prohibits such exploitation and points out that an economy based on the exploitation of other peoples and their resources cannot be beneficial in its consequences, nor can it endure. Only such economic development is beneficial and enduring as is based upon the exploitation of a country’s own resources and on equitable sharing with others of the bounties which God has provided for each people.

“Do not raise thine eyes covetously after that which We have bestowed on some groups, to enjoy for a period, of the ornaments of this life that We may try them thereby⎯the provision bestowed upon thee by thy Lord is better and more enduring” (20:132).

The Quran admonishes against such behaviour, pointing out that the strength or weakness of a people is no indication or measure of its superiority or inferiority. In any case, the Quran emphasises that, in the process of the rise and fall of nations, a people that is weak today may become strong tomorrow, and memories of conduct that occasioned resentment or engendered ill-will would rankle and lead to disturbance of good relations (3:141; 49:12).

Another source of international conflict is the divergence between proclaimed intentions and policies and actual practice and conduct. Doubts concerning motives and designs are bound to be raised by a state whose conduct is inconsistent with its undertakings and its proclaimed policies and aims. From such conduct a situation serious enough to endanger international relations can result. The Quran therefore insists on complete conformity of conduct to declarations and professions of intent.

“O ye who believe, why do you say that which you do not: most displeasing is it in the sight of Allah that you should say what you do not” (61:3⎯4).

On the other hand, it warns against indulgence in undue suspicion of other people’s motives and against seeking to discover pretexts for differences and disagreements, as this might result in much harm.

“O ye who believe, avoid suspicion, for suspicion in some cases might do great harm” (49:13).

Experience shows that a too ready credence of rumours, and their wide publicity, may cause grave repercussions in the sphere of international relations. These rumours may have their origin in deliberate mischief or may be the product of a too active imagination, but the harm done might sometimes be serious. The Quran warns Muslims to be extremely careful in this respect. They are told to apply a rigorous test to everything that may emanate from a source not completely dependable and trustworthy, for carelessness in this respect might not only give rise to tension but entail grave consequences.

“O ye who believe, if news comes to you from an untrustworthy source, examine it carefully, lest you do harm to a people in ignorance and then be sorry for what you did” (49:7).

“This is the ultimate Islamic philosophy. Without returning to God one cannot attain peace and without that peace, peace in society cannot be built. All human efforts to create peace from selfish ulterior motives are bound to fail and come to nothing. If there is no God, there is no peace. That is the ultimate wisdom!!!”